Strategic Startup Marketing
WeWork’s Strategic Decisions: A Startup Founder’s Guide to Hype, Hubris, and Hard Lessons
Share your love
WeWork’s meteoric rise and spectacular fall is a cautionary tale that every startup founder should study. Let’s dissect the strategic decisions that initially wowed investors, what ultimately went wrong, and what we can learn from the co-working space globally.
The Hype Machine: What Got Investors Excited
| Factor | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Vision and Storytelling | Positioned as a tech company revolutionizing work and life | High investor appeal |
| Rapid Expansion | Expanded to 111 cities in 29 countries in under a decade | Demonstrated scalability |
| Community Focus | Tapped into millennial desire for workplace community | Created brand loyalty |
| Innovative Design | Instagram-worthy spaces set new office aesthetics standard | Attracted high-profile clients |
| Tech Integration | Custom app and data analytics for space utilization | Justified tech company valuation |
The House of Cards: What Went Wrong
- Unsustainable Business Model: Long-term leases vs. short-term rentals
- Lack of Profitability: $1.9B loss on $1.8B revenue in 2018
- Corporate Governance Issues: Unchecked power, conflicts of interest
- Overvaluation: $47B valuation based on hype, not financials
- Cultural Problems: Toxic “cult-like” culture, discrimination lawsuits
Global Competitors: A Different Approach
| Company | Strategy | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| IWG (Regus) | Slow, steady growth; focus on profitability | Stable business, less investor appeal |
| Convene (US) | Focus on high-end corporate clients and events | More sustainable, slower growth |
| Ucommune (China) | Rapid expansion in Asia (similar to WeWork) | Similar challenges, reduced IPO expectations |
| Awfis (India) | Focus on tier 2 and 3 cities, cost-effective model | Steady growth, better positioned for Indian market |
Lessons for Startup Founders
- Substance Over Style: Back compelling stories with solid financials
- Sustainable Growth: Prioritize path to profitability over rapid expansion
- Realistic Valuation: Avoid hype-based valuations that set unrealistic expectations
- Strong Governance: Implement checks and balances to prevent power concentration
- Market Understanding: Embrace your industry; don’t masquerade as something you’re not
- Positive Culture: Build a strong, ethical culture from the ground up
- Competitor Analysis: Study both successful and struggling competitors for insights
The Smarketer’s Take
WeWork’s story is a masterclass in the dangers of prioritizing hype over fundamentals. As a startup founder, it’s easy to get caught up in the allure of rapid growth and eye-popping valuations. But remember, true success is built on solid foundations, not sand castles of hype.
Consider this comparison of WeWork’s approach vs. a sustainable startup approach:
| Aspect | WeWork’s Approach | Sustainable Startup Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Growth Strategy | Rapid expansion at all costs | Controlled, profitable growth |
| Valuation | Based on hype and future potential | Based on current financials and realistic projections |
| Corporate Culture | “Move fast and break things” mentality | Ethical, inclusive, and balanced |
| Industry Positioning | Tech company (despite being real estate) | Honest about core business model |
| Investor Relations | Charismatic leadership, big promises | Transparency, realistic goals |
The co-working industry itself isn’t flawed – it’s how WeWork approached it that led to their downfall. By learning from both WeWork’s mistakes and the more measured approaches of their global competitors, you can build a startup that’s not just exciting, but truly sustainable.
So, the next time you’re crafting your pitch deck or planning your growth strategy, ask yourself: Am I building the next WeWork, or am I building something that will stand the test of time? Your answer could make all the difference between being a cautionary tale and a true success story.
